Tagged: London conference Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • roydendsouza 6:55 pm on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , London conference, , , , , , , ,   

    Good, Bad and Ugly Taliban 

    Has India been forced to toe the line of the West in making a distinction between the Good Taliban and the Bad Taliban? New Delhi has maintained that there is, and can be, no such distinction. The London Conference however, seems to have forced New Delhi to concur with the West, on the need to “reintegrate” sections and individuals of the Taliban, rather than bring about “reconciliation” – albeit within the “red lines”.
    Now if that is so many words is not the same as engaging the Good Taliban, I don’t know what is!
    What’s worse, we don’t seem to be nimble at all in adapting to the fast-changing Af-Pak scenario. As a result it appears win-win for Pakistan.

     
  • roydendsouza 6:41 pm on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , London conference, , , , , , , ,   

    Has India been forced to toe the line of the West in making a distinction between the Good Taliban and the Bad Taliban? New Delhi has maintained that there is, and can be, no such distinction. The London Conference however, seems to have forced New Delhi to concur with the West, on the need to “reintegrate” sections and individuals of the Taliban, rather than bring about “reconciliation” – albeit within the “red lines”.
    Now if that in so many words, is not the same as engaging the Good Taliban, then I don’t know what is!
    What’s worse, we don’t seem to be nimble at all, in adapting to the fast-changing Af-Pak scenario. As a result, it appears to be win-win for Pakistan.

     
    • Neel 7:02 pm on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      India has been following a wise policy of keeping a low profile in Afghanistan, staying away from military operations and focusing on reconstruction jos.

      Given its low profile role, it is not in a position to dictate or influence the military-tactical decisions of the US lead NATO forces.

      India, however has a huge stake in the future outcome of Afghanistan. It is therefore necessary for India to take all possible measures to protect its own nation interests in the region, and not leave it for the US-NATO forces to decide.

      India must collaborate with the other regional stakeholders in Afghanistan, namely Iran, Russia and the Central Asian Republics, to ensure that the pro-Taliban extremist forces supported by Pakistan can not gain upper hand in Afghanistan.

      • roydendsouza 9:01 pm on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Thank you for your views. Strategic depth is rarely a factor of military presence.
        However, do read my latest post on ‘Despatches And File Notings’ @ roydendsouza.wordpress.com

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel